RE: [xsl] versioning

Subject: RE: [xsl] versioning
From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:36:33 +0400 (AMT)
> > ... Yet it turns out that
> > XSLT 2.0 is not upto the task of converting from XSLT 1.0 to XSLT 2.0.
> The problem is that XSLT is not a true XML language: the XPath literals
> are not broken up into a tree structure. So in order to transform XSLT 1.0
> it will be almost essential to delegate the XPath parse to some Java code.

Isn't it a problem XSLT 2.0 is designed to address through its 
string parsing and manipulation primitives? 

David Tolpin

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread