RE: [xsl] Re: Re: Counting nodes efficiently

Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Re: Counting nodes efficiently
From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:32:21 -0000

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Wendell Piez 

    At 05:22 PM 2/19/2004, you wrote:
    >I hope that the right term will prevail through being more 
    frequently used.
    Me too. "Forward walk?"

Controlled tree walk? Since its the control that aids the task?
Is it relevant that its forwards, since the only requirement is 
that it visits every node carrying its load of the information needed?

<grin/> A parameterised tree walk? 

regards DaveP
(caught up in Wendells wordsmithing :-)


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread