Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors - W3C schemas only?

[Jeff Kenton <jkenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Michael Kay wrote:
> # 
> # Of course, unless _someone_ other than Michael Kay. steps up and
> # implements XSLT2, there may never be an XSLT2 at all, I think it would
> # be hard to get out of CR if all but one XSLT implementor boycots XSLT2
> # and stays at XSLT1.
> # 
>
> I'm reasonably confident, reading between the lines, that two or three other
> implementations are in progress. But don't expect people to announce
> products until the specs get to CR: no-one wants to be in the WD-xsl
> position of having to support a draft that turned out not to be as final as
> they thought it would be.

Let me second this.  As Chairman of the OASIS XSLT Conformance Committee (no, not the W3C WG), I know of at least 4 implementations in progress, in addition to Saxon.  When the Final Draft becomes final, expect lots of product announcements.

XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list