Subject: Re: [xsl] Unknown variables in XPATH (2.0) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:43:01 GMT |
> My question is, do people consider this a valid interpretation of the > draft recommendation, If it's in XSLT then no, and not really within the bounds of what can be done via the extension mechanism either, ie something implementing that would be a non-xslt/xpath system. (Not that there is necessarily anything wrong with having a user option to become a system with extended features, so long as people know that's what they have) However I suppose if it's just an Xpath application then you get to decide the host language embedding and at a stretch you could declare that the initial context includes a binding of every possible QName to the value false. However this seems to be against the spirit of the thing, are you sure you want this? > or should I make it an optional feature? Definitely don't make it the default behaviour, David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Unknown variables in XPATH (2, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | RE: [xsl] Unknown variables in XPAT, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Unknown variables in XPATH (2, Colin Paul Adams | Date | RE: [xsl] Unknown variables in XPAT, Michael Kay |
Month |