Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional language From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 30 Mar 2004 18:12:14 +0100 |
>>>>> "Kenny" == Kenny Akridge <kenny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Kenny> I'm just curious- what specifically makes you believe that Kenny> XPath is not functional? And when I say XPath, I am Kenny> referring to the spec, not an implementation. Because: a) You cannot define functions within XPath, and b) You cannot pass function definitions as arguments to functions. Either is sufficient. -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional, M. David Peterson | Thread | [xsl] Sorting order, Shashi . Bhushan |
RE: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional, Kenny Akridge | Date | [xsl] new thread... difference betw, Shashi Kiran |
Month |