Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 challenge From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 13:58:49 +0100 |
One point of interest here is the the $first variable must be declared as 'element()+' so that we can access it's siblings later on (thanks to Roger L. Costello post on the Saxon list for that). Or in this case you could, as in xslt1, just use select= on the xsl:variable rather than using xsl:variable with content <xsl:variable name="first" as="element()+"> <xsl:sequence select= is equivalent to <xsl:variable name="first" select= David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xslt 2.0 challenge, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] xslt 2.0 challenge, David . Pawson |
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 challenge, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Can I change variable con, David Carlisle |
Month |