Subject: Re: [xsl] Javascript in Xsl using-Xalan-Problem From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:17:00 -0600 |
> I quite agree. I would much rather have the serious programmers make > the effort to learn XSLT, but as a consultant my control is limited. > Having the department-oriented business rules in JavaScript does mean > that the programmers have less of an excuse not to maintain it. Ah, yes... I can understand your predicament. > > I am also looking forward to your port of Saxon to .NET. You and me both :) Were going to make a project announcement here in the next day or so so keep your eyes peeled for that. > I am sticking with Java for the cross-platform support but those VB > programmers are more likely to accept a .NET solution. For good reason. We are hoping to put a lot of smiles on peoples faces when were done, our own faces being one of them :) Best of luck with your project! <M:D/>
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Javascript in Xsl using-X, Barry Lay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Javascript in Xsl using-X, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Fwd: multiple/default tem, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Lookup table and maintain, Mukul Gandhi |
Month |