|
Subject: RE: [xsl] follow-up: document function issue - relative URIs From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:25:38 +0100 |
>
> > Remember that document(.) interprets the URI relative to the source
> > document, while document(string(.)) interprets it relative to the
> > stylesheet.
>
> what is actually the difference between "the source document"
> and the "stylesheet"?
>
> should an xslt processor (also 1.0 processors like Xalan or
> Saxon 6.x) resolve the URI parameter of a document function
> call - e.g. document('somedir/somefile.xml') - normally
> relative to the stylesheet in which the call is in?
The rules for the document() function are explicit: if the first argument is
a node-set, the URI is resolved relative to the node (typically in a source
document) that contains the URI in question; if the argument is a string,
then the URI is resolved relative to the base URI of the element in the
stylesheet containing the call to document().
Michael Kay
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| follow-up: document function issue , christof.hoeke | Thread | RE: [xsl] document function issue.., Markus Gamperl |
| RE: [xsl] document function issue.., Markus Gamperl | Date | AW: [xsl] follow-up: relative URIs, christof.hoeke |
| Month |