RE: [xsl] xslt processers for Windows NT - recommendations ? whic h is the best ?

[Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Abhi,

Some questions arise... Which NT environment do you use? Is your target
using .NET?

Anyway, apart from being able to use MSXML 4.0, or XslTransform, other
options are using Java based implementations like Saxon, or Xalan.

Personally I am using MSXML 4.0 and it works pretty well for me sofar. I
also use XslTransform and it does the job fairly well also. I most of the
time use Xselerator for the development of stylesheets using MSXML 4.0 and
then use XslTransform under .NET to implement them. Works great sofar.

I do not work with huge source documents, but if you are then XslTransform
may or may not give you some problems (according to a recent post) - in that
case using MSXML 4.0 as a COM component is an option or a Java based XSLT
processor if you do not use .NET or COM.

HTH,
<prs/>

-----Original Message-----
From: SANWAL, ABHISHEK (HP-Houston) [mailto:abhishek.sanwal@xxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 11:36 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [xsl] xslt processers for Windows NT - recommendations ? which is
the best ?

Hello,

If someone needed to run an XSLT processor on a Windows NT environment what
would you recommend? Also please, comment on each of the options below.

MSXML 4.0 ?

.NET System.Xml.Xsl ? (Noticed that for .NET framework Redistributable WinNT
is okay but for the SDK its not.. any experts on this?)

Non Microsoft recommendations?

Let us know please. 
Thanks,

Abhi

____________________________________________________________

Abhishek Sanwal
HP - Houston Campus



--+------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--+--