Subject: AW: AW: AW: [xsl] commenting and documenting XSLT (small survey) From: <christof.hoeke@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 14:01:15 +0200 |
> > - It is quite an effort to write > > how can it be harder to write xml elements (especially if you > are using > an xml editor) than to write your suggested alternative, which is xml > elements inside a comment? > > I agree that if you are writing simple one-liners then the smaller > overhead of the comment syntax is often more appropriate, but that > didn't appear to be what you were suggesting. > > > - very difficult to read (not meant to be readable at a > glance but comments should be IMHO) > > ditto > > David > sorry, i probably did not make myself too clear, my fault. i am not suggesting using XHTML or XML inside XML comments (although that is one method the xsldoc app works but i would like to dump that as it is in only for historic reasons). rather i am suggesting using the ReST (being a markup but *not* an XML style markup) format to use. i think something like: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ a list ====== * item 1 * item 2 with some *emphasized* or ``tt`` text ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ is very readable and quite "writable" as well. it is just a nice way to write comments and it quite easy to process into XHTML afterwards. chris
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: AW: AW: [xsl] commenting and do, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: AW: AW: AW: [xsl] commenting an, David Carlisle |
Re: AW: AW: [xsl] commenting and do, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] Generate N elements, Kenny Bogoe (BogoeMD |
Month |