Subject: Re: [xsl] position= and blocks (was And operator usage in XSL)|
From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:34:15 -0500
However, reading the description relative-position I'm not 100% clear what it means for blocks. My initial reading is that it has no effect but I also grant that the description is confusing at best.
Doing an experiment with XEP 3.77 and XSL Formatter 2.5 it appears that relative-position has no effect on blocks. My test instance is below. The first two blocks format the same with XSL Formatter. With XEP, the second block is only 2in wide (the 1.0 spec is ambiguous about whether width= is meaningful on fo:block). The second two blocks are formatted with identical positioning by both formatters.
Eliot -- W. Eliot Kimber Professional Services Innodata Isogen 9030 Research Blvd, #410 Austin, TX 78758 (512) 372-8122
|<- Previous||Index||Next ->|
|Re: [xsl] And operator usage in XSL, Eliot Kimber||Thread||Re: [xsl] position= and blocks (was, john farrow|
|Re: [xsl] And operator usage in XSL, Eliot Kimber||Date||RE: [xsl] Spotting "cousin marriage, Michael Kay|