AW: [xsl] RE: Small Caps Solution (a bit long)

Subject: AW: [xsl] RE: Small Caps Solution (a bit long)
From: <christof.hoeke@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:42:41 +0200
[sorry, a bit off-topic but a follow up]


> The trouble is that the font has to have an actual small-caps
> variant built
> into it for that technique to work. As it happens, very few
> fonts do have a
> small-caps variant, which leaves the decision of how to
> render the string to
> the browser. I have read that, with most fonts, most browsers
> either ignore
> the setting or render the string as all caps. I wanted
> neither of those
> results.
>

that is a problem, yes.

on the other hand only very few fonts can be used relatively safely on the web
anyway. I only briefly tested save fonts on Windows, but all seem to have a
small-caps variant. Depending on your target platform that might be not what
you want. But at least Mac browsers either should have these exact same fonts
too (with Microsoft font pack that installs with Mac IE) or I strongly suspect
Mac OS own fonts have this font-variant as well (just by being Mac fonts ;).

All the following (MS) fonts have a small caps variant:
	Arial (Mac: Helvetica?)
	Verdana (Mac: Lucida grande?)
	Times New Roman
	Georgia
	Courier

I guess the XSL you presented does not make a great difference in your
environment (speed of transformation?), but at least it blows up the size of
the HTML.

> So, no, that's not what I sought, but thank you for suggesting it.
>

anytime, sorry to have been no real help


chris

Current Thread