Subject: Re: [xsl] organization for large numbers of templates From: "Agnes Kielen" <agnes.kielen@xxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 12:19:42 +0200 |
Hi, I don't know of any standards, but my suggestion is to organize them in seperate files and directories. This resembles the OO approach. One class is normalley defined in one Java-file and packages are grouped in directories. To improve the maintainability you can also document you're code like Java, see www.kielen.com Regards, Agnes ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Chrisman" <incubus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004 10:15 PM Subject: [xsl] organization for large numbers of templates > I'm wondering if the issue of organizing relatively large numbers of > templates. Currently I have a reasonably maintainable XSLt code base, > but as I add templates, I tend to lump them into libraries by functionality. > > Are there any standards, specs, or ideas on formalizing groupings of templates > much like Object Oriented Programming has grouped functions/methods into classes > etc? > > I know I can kind of do this on my own, and have been doing so.. I'm just > wondering if there's a directive or recommendation out there for such. > > thanks, > Brian Chrisman
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] organization for large number, Brian Chrisman | Thread | [xsl] anyone know how firefox does , Bryan Rasmussen |
[xsl] organization for large number, Brian Chrisman | Date | [xsl] anyone know how firefox does , Bryan Rasmussen |
Month |