|
Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT, XHTML, and default attribute values [somewhat OT] From: "Andrew Welch" <ajwelch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:03:15 +0100 |
> Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Dane <jdane@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > Joseph> A consequence of this is that default attribute > values get > > Joseph> added to the tree before my processor has a > chance operate > > Joseph> on it. > > > > Only if your XML parser reads the DTD. If you can configure > it not to > > do so (and most have such a configuration option), then this won't > > happen. > > that's true. but then why not just remove the DTD > altogether? then you don't have to support obscure and/or > parser dependant configuration options. I'm not sure it is true. If a DTD is specified in the xml the parser *must* attempt to read it to ensure any defaulted values are present in the XML, regardless of configuration. Turning off validation (I think) simply suppresses validation errors. The only way I know of to parse an xml file with a DTD specified (without access to the DTD itself) is to implement a custom entity resolver. Of course, you can edit the XML file prior to transforming to remove the doctype, but regex'ing over xml markup just feels wrong. I don't understand the benefits of using defaulted values, as anyone studying the xml also needs to study the dtd to ensure they get the full picture. Seems crazy, really. cheers andrew.
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Inserting leaf node names, cking | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT, XHTML, and default , David Carlisle |
| [xsl] Re: [xml-dev] ANN: EXSLT.NET , Elliotte Harold | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT, XHTML, and default , David Carlisle |
| Month |