Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?

Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 07 Oct 2004 15:35:09 +0100
>>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Bruce> This sounds interesting, but does this mean Mono also?  I'm
    Bruce> not really clear on the relationship between .NET and Mono.

The answer should be yes.

My own xslt 2.0 processor should compile to the .NET platform as well
as various native architectures, and so should also run on Mono, but I
haven't tested this as I don't have a windows machine, nor a compiler
to target .NET, and I haven't bothered to ask anyone else to try this
out yet, as it's still alpha. 
-- 
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire

Current Thread