Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?

Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?
From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:30:37 +0200

Bruce D'Arcus wrote:

So that means XQP will be such a project? I got confused because you wrote ".NET platform"; but it sounds like you're just intending to write a processor in C#?

Well, actually .NET is a platform name (aka CLI, not to be confused with Microsoft .NET) and Mono as well as dotGNU are also .NET implementations, e.g. see http://www.mono-project.com/about/index.html. And yes, the programming language is C#. -- Oleg Tkachenko http://blog.tkachenko.com Multiconn Technologies, Israel

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued) Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:44:09 -0400 Colin Paul Adams - 07 Oct 2004 15:43:53 +0100 Oleg Tkachenko - Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:24:09 +0200 Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:21:05 -0400 Oleg Tkachenko - Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:30:37 +0200 <= Marty McKeever - Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:17:00 -0400 Marcus Andersson - Sat, 02 Oct 2004 23:45:14 +0200 Pieter Reint Siegers Kort - Mon, 4 Oct 2004 09:18:25 -0500

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued)
- Pieter Reint Siegers Kort - Mon, 4 Oct 2004 09:18:25 -0500

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Bruce D'Arcus	Thread	[xsl] Seeking XSL projects in Charl, Marty McKeever
[xsl] trasformation of a Word Docum, marinabortolotti\@li	Date	RE: [xsl] trasformation of a Word D, Lincoln Mitchell
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home