Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:04:25 +0100 |
> Is it still a worthwhile addition in 2.0? > We wouldn't want to remove something that's already in 1.0. Given that you've already got version on LREs, I think generalizing it so you can put the version attributes on top-level elements such as xsl:template does make sense: it's less work for the implementor to allow it everywhere than to have complex rules about where it can appear, and it's a lot more useful for users at the template level than at the LRE level. We also have a number of statically scoped attributes such as xpath-default-namespace and it makes sense for them all to have the same rules. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 v, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 v, Mukul Gandhi |
RE: [xsl] xsl:sort with msxml engli, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 v, Pawson, David |
Month |