Subject: Re: [xsl] following-sibling problem From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:56:55 +0100 |
> I needed to remove the [1] on the apply-templates (because otherwise I > only get the first bullet), and then I end up with duplicates again: No, you need the [1] there. However as I said, you then need to make each level n template apply siblings to _its_ immediate sibling if it is also level n, as the later siblings are not (now) being handled by the parent. This is the standard "sideways tree walk" to do positional grouping examples in the archives (definitely) and faq (Id guess) but as you are using 2.0 you can more easily use the positional grouping primitive, especially as Michael just supplied full code:-) David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] following-sibling problem, Bruce D'Arcus | Thread | RE: [xsl] following-sibling problem, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] following-sibling problem, Bruce D'Arcus | Date | Re: [xsl] exslt question, couldn't , Bryan Rasmussen |
Month |