Subject: Re: [xsl] 'nother xslt2 engine From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:26:14 -0800 |
"David" == M David Peterson <m.david@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
David> Colin, any comments in regards to the specific platforms in David> which you feel are best suited to run your Eiffel based David> XSLT 2.0 processor.
Any except JVM. Reasons for not suitable on JVM are:
1) Saxon is more complete in most respects. 2) More seriously, I don't think SmartEiffel 1.0's compile_to_java command works, and none of the other compilers target the JVM, so it would be necessary to do JNI programming, or somethin glike that.
David> XSLT 2.0 processor. Is this a Basic or Schema Aware David> implementation? If Basic are you planning a Schema Aware David> version?
Basic. No current plans for Schema awarness - I'd have to write a schema processor first.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] 'nother xslt2 engine, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | RE: [xsl] 'nother xslt2 engine, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Dynamic processing of xml, M. David Peterson | Date | Re: [xsl] mathML2SVG, David Carlisle |
Month |