RE: [xsl] mathML2SVG

[Bryan Rasmussen <bry@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Well damn I'm also interested, especially as I was thinking about developing it
for myself anyway. 
-- 
Bryan Rasmussen


Quoting Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Why not create a project on SF.net? All would be benefitted with that move,
> I think.
> 
> Apart from that, did you also post your offer on the SVG list monitored by
> Kurt Gagle?
> 
> A bit getting OT, but anyway, here it goes, for the good cause :-)
> 
> Cheers,
> <prs/> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew L. Avizinis [mailto:mla@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:39 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [xsl] mathML2SVG
> 
> I sent this yesterday, but apparently it failed. so here it is again
> 
> ok, then.  I'll put the stuff together.  However, I think I'll let you
> folks
> peruse the code first before any other announcement -- there're probably a
> good number of defects or code that can be better written and additionally
> I'm a stinker when it comes to commentary, for the most part.
> Anyhow, is there a preferred method of posting here? some of the files are
> fairly long.  should I just provide a bunch of http links to a set of files
> or should I post several messages here with the contents of each file
> included as text and notated where the start and end is for each file?  In
> either case it will be Wednesday or Thursday before I'll have time to put
> it
> up.  I hope nobody turns blue holding their breath...  :) Finally, the
> reason I developed the thing was so that my company could better render
> equations/formulae in pdf format with FOP.  Works for most cases we use
> around here.
> Matthew
> 
> David Carlisle wrote:
> 
> >>   Anyone here interested in a set of templates that converts a fairly 
> >>good subset of presentation mathML to SVG format using a fixed width 
> >>font?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Me!
> >
> >you could announce on www-math@xxxxxx as well, and we could add a link 
> >on the mathml software page at w3c.
> >
> >Copyright and licence issues: I'm not a lwayer as the saying goes, but 
> >it's generally best to put something explicit in the file, GPL if you 
> >are happy with that or perhaps the W3C's software licence which is 
> >rather more easy going than GPL. See for example the licence comments 
> >in the MathML stylesheets at http://www.w3.org/Math/XSL which are 
> >copyright me, but licenced under the W3C licence (which means, 
> >basically you can do what you want within reason)
> >
> >David
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >_ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is 
> >powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus 
> >service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
> >http://www.star.net.uk
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >_