RE: [xsl] alternative to FO?

Subject: RE: [xsl] alternative to FO?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:05:16 -0000
> <xsl:stylesheet version='1.0'
> xmlns:xsl='http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform'
> xmlns:fx='http://www.pragma-ade.com/rlg/foxet.rng' output='xml'
> charset='UTF-8'>
> 
> He's using xsltproc, if that makes a difference.
> 
> What's the output= and charset=
> attributes all about?
> 
> I didn't *think* they were standard.
> 

It's not only non-standard, it's an error that all conforming processors are
required to report.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread