RE: [xsl] Complex for-each comparison problem

Subject: RE: [xsl] Complex for-each comparison problem
From: <Jarno.Elovirta@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:41:33 +0200
Hi,

> What do you mean with "nameofyourunnamedelement"?

After you corrected yourself, the expression should be

itable[@id = i/paramter/value]/@name

> What is the "/@s" at the end?

My typo, I meant the name attribute.

Cheers,

Jarno

> Why "@value", i thought you get the content of an CDATA field
> with "value" simply.
>
> Thanks
> Sven
>
> > <xsl:for-each select="itable[@id =
> i/paramter/nameofyourunnamedelement/@value]/@s">
> >   <xsl:value-of select="."/>
> > </xsl:for-each>
>
>
>
> Jarno.Elovirta@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >>i wrote days before about CDATA compare problems and now i
> >>know my problem is at another point.
> >>
> >>xml:
> >>-------------------------------------
> >><itables>
> >>   <itable id=1 name="h">
> >>      <i>
> >>         <paramter>
> >>	    <value="<![CDATA[7]]>"/>
> >
> >
> > The last time I check XML 1.0 spec, an element had to have
> a name and LESS-THAN SIGN was not allowed in attribute value.
> >
> >
> >>	    <value="<![CDATA[8]]>"/>
> >>	 </paramter>
> >>      </i>
> >>   <itable id=2 name="s">
> >>      <i>
> >>         <paramter>
> >>	    <value="<![CDATA[1]]>"/>
> >>	    <value="<![CDATA[5]]>"/>
> >>	 </paramter>
> >>      </i>
> >>   </itable>
> >></itables>
> >>-------------------------------------
> >>
> >>I want to compare each itable/@id with each value:
> >>
> >>itable id=1 with
> >>	<![CDATA[7]]>
> >>	<![CDATA[8]]>
> >>	<![CDATA[1]]>
> >>	<![CDATA[5]]>
> >>
> >>itable id=2 with
> >>	<![CDATA[7]]>
> >>	<![CDATA[8]]>
> >>	<![CDATA[1]]>
> >>	<![CDATA[5]]>
> >>
> >>and then i want give out the itable name where id = value.
> >
> >
> > <xsl:for-each select="itable[@id =
> i/paramter/nameofyourunnamedelement/@value]/@s">
> >   <xsl:value-of select="."/>
> > </xsl:for-each>
> >
> >>I hope i expressed myself clearly.
> >
> >
> > It always helps if your example XML is well-formed, that
> way people don't have to quess or attempt error recovery.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jarno

Current Thread