Subject: Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter mapping expression From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 05 Dec 2004 11:47:20 +0000 |
>>>>> "Dimtre" == Dimtre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> How about: >> >> f:a ($pFun, $pList) >> >> :-) :-) :-) >> >> I don't understand the compactness requirement. Dimtre> It can be very essential -- if the "/" operator allowed an Dimtre> arbitrary sequence on the left, then it would be Dimtre> preferrable to f:map() Dimtre> But I'm not satisfied at all with the currently (un) Dimtre> available ways to define the type of such higher order Dimtre> operators in XPath2. Don't you mean XSLT 2.0 Dimtre> Compare to the strict type definition in Haskell: Dimtre> map :: (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b] I see what you mean - for f:map you currently have: <xsl:function name="f:map" as="item()*"> <xsl:param name="pFun" as="element()"/> <xsl:param name="pList1" as="item()*"/> whereas what you want is: <xsl:function name="f:map" like="pList1"> <xsl:param name="pFun" as="element()"/> <xsl:param name="pList1" as="item()*"/> which is not valid XSLT 2.0. And I guess it's probably too late to have such a proposal considered. -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter map, Dimtre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter map, Dimtre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter map, M. David Peterson | Date | Re: [xsl] Split XML file into seper, M. David Peterson |
Month |