RE: [xsl] functions and sequences

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] functions and sequences

Subject: RE: [xsl] functions and sequences
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:58:21 -0000

> Actually, I meant:
> 
>     - Extend the definition of the concat() function, so that *each*
> of its (one or more)
> arguments is of type non-empty sequence of xs:string or non-empty
> sequence of text
> nodes.

We didn't do that because it would introduce backwards compatibility
problems.

concat(author, title, subject) in 1.0 gives you the first author and ignores
the rest.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] functions and sequences, (continued) Michael Kay - Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:02:02 -0000 Dimtre Novatchev - Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:14:51 +1100 Michael Kay - Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:35:50 -0000 Dimtre Novatchev - Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:21:44 +1100 Michael Kay - Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:58:21 -0000 <= David Carlisle - Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:04:25 GMT

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] functions and sequences, Dimtre Novatchev	Thread	Re: [xsl] functions and sequences, David Carlisle
Re: [xsl] Using id() when id and id, David Carlisle	Date	Re: [xsl] functions and sequences, David Carlisle
	Month