Subject: RE: [xsl] RE: displaying characters From: Andrew Curry <andrew.curry@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:09:21 -0000 |
he he well i think we will continue with the substitution method, its only for a wire report so is not a big deal... just a shame its cant be done a little neater. Thanks for your help. -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: 16 December 2004 12:04 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: displaying characters > Is it recommended to use xml 1.1 at this time? well if you find an application that supports it and you need that feature, why not, but in general, Norm who's on both the TAG and XML Core groups commented recently: http://norman.walsh.name/2004/09/30/xml11 which has the title: XML 1.1: Dead on Arrival David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: displaying characters, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] grouping confusion, Bruce D'Arcus |
Re: [xsl] RE: displaying characters, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Problem with encoding UTF, Pawson, David |
Month |