RE: [xsl] binary XML

Subject: RE: [xsl] binary XML
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:38:57 -0000
> Frankly, i wonder if the work now done in XML/XSL will have to be
> rewitern or redefined because of that...

One of the reasons that XSLT is defined in terms of an abstract tree model
of a document is that it's completely unaffected if someone chooses to
define a different on-the-wire transfer syntax.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread