Subject: RE: [xsl] binary XML From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:38:57 -0000 |
> Frankly, i wonder if the work now done in XML/XSL will have to be > rewitern or redefined because of that... One of the reasons that XSLT is defined in terms of an abstract tree model of a document is that it's completely unaffected if someone chooses to define a different on-the-wire transfer syntax. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] binary XML, António Mota | Thread | Re: [xsl] binary XML, António Mota |
[xsl] when to use xslt, Henning Waack | Date | Re: [xsl] super basic xsl question, Wendell Piez |
Month |