Subject: [xsl] Use of fictitious types in the F & O spec considered unsatisfactory From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:14:04 +1100 |
The use of the so called "numeric" type in defining the op:numericXXX operators in the Functions and Opertors spec results in unwanted confusion and complexity of the document. Firstly, it uses an undefined type. Secondly, this results in a special rule that some "system" functions and operators *only* can have overloads with the same number of arguments. The solution is obvious: define the type "numeric" and support it as a builtin type. This is not unprecedented, as we already have such types as xdt:anyAtomicType and xdt:untypedAtomic I propose that there should be an xdt:numeric defined builtin type in Xpath 2.0. This may also unify and make more simple or intuitive the rules for conversion between different numeric types. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl / xpath and namespace, Jeb Boniakowski | Thread | [xsl] Browsers, Marcos Hercules Sant |
[xsl] Help with recursion (was: my , Chris Picton | Date | Re: [xsl] Help with recursion (was:, Joris Gillis |
Month |