Subject: Re: [xsl] how xslt2 affects usage of programming constructs From: Bryan Rasmussen <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:14:24 +0100 |
> I use exclusively f:map() where normally one would use xsl:for-each. > what is the benefit? i suppose you do it for a specific benefit or is it because of syntactical preference. > As already demonstrated in my recent code, I am increasingly using the > FXSL HOF wrappers of the corresponding "original" XPath F & Os -- such > as: > > f:mult() instead of '*' > > f:add() instead of '+' > > f:mod() instead of mod > > f:string-length() instead of string-length() > > f:name() instead of name() > i would like to read your reasons for this. i have been working on a paper tbat has parts that relates to fxsl, and i have found a similar habit in using functions at a higher level, but i think my experiences are probably different than yours as i have taken a different approach.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] how xslt2 affects usage o, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] how xslt2 affects usage o, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] how xslt2 affects usage o, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] case-sensitivity in xml, RQamar |
Month |