| 
 
Subject: Re: [xsl] Optimization Question From: Kevin Jones <kjones@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:41:21 +0000  | 
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 09:31, Michael Kay wrote: > Whether you generate bytecode or not, many of the > operations that take time - XML parsing and tree > building, copying, sorting, serializing, are likely to be > done by routines in the run-time library; they aren't > affected by compilation at all. I did an estimate of this effect a fair while ago via the addition of some extra timing code to a processor. If I recall correctly my conclusion was there was on average typically only about 10% of the processing time that could be significantly influenced by choice of runtime, be that interpreter, virtual machine or native code. Kev.
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Optimization Question, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Issue with xsl:sort - does no, Jon Bråten | 
| Re: [xsl] Node Position() always eq, Cynthia DeLaria | Date | Re: [xsl] Copy all preceding-siblin, Wendell Piez | 
| Month |