Subject: RE: [xsl] Decimal precision From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:10:46 -0000 |
> So, what is the more direct representation of the empty sequence? () XPath 2.0 processors are quite likely to give you a warning when you write "/..", or other "guaranteed empty" path expressions such as @text() or @foo/@bar. Under strict static typing these are errors - they fall into the same category as path expressions containing misspelt names such as doc/chatper. XSLT 2.0 doesn't use strict static typing but processors can still report warnings for any path expression that's statically known to be empty. > > Would it be interesting to you to be a member of the FXSL > project team? > It would be interesting, but there aren't enough hours in the day... Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Decimal precision, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] Decimal precision, Dimitre Novatchev |
RE: [xsl] Processing Entity ' , Greg Alvord | Date | Re: [xsl] Decimal precision, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |