Subject: Re: [xsl] Muenchian grouping From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:06:09 -0800 (PST) |
Thank you David for sharing this post. Its indeed a URL to bookmark. I have done so! Regards, Mukul --- David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > But we cannot undermine the importance of > Muenchian grouping. > > Oh I didn't mean to undermine that. > In fact I was one of the first to see that: SM > mailed me (and MK I think, > can't remember) outlining his idea to use keys for > grouping just shortly before he > mailed it to this list. One of the things that > finally weaned me off xt > (which didn't support keys) > > > > ah found SM's mail (Fri, 5 May 2000, originally sent > to Michael Kay then > forwarded by Steve to me as well) > > Not sure I should post other people's mail though, > although an interesting > historical record:-) > > Here's Steve's public posting a few days later > > http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200005/msg00270.html > > David __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Muenchian grouping, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Muenchian grouping, Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] using variables in xsl va, Joris Gillis | Date | [xsl] problem retrieving node attri, RQamar |
Month |