RE: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files

Subject: RE: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files
From: Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:39:25 -0600
Of course, there are more roads that lead to Rome :-)

Cheers,
<prs/>

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Jueves, 10 de Marzo de 2005 05:55 p.m.
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files

I haven't done it myself, but it's quite possible to install a Java servlet
container such as tomcat under IIS:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/install/iis.html

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antsnio Mota [mailto:amsmota@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 10 March 2005 22:57
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files
>
> I'll go talk to our administration guy to try to know if there is
> allready a asp.net in the server, as i think they allready develop in
> asp.net, but it's not really my domain...
>
> I'll get back to you later if i need some help installing Saxon.NET.
> But i still wold prefer Java...
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:18:12 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort
> <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > :)
> >
> > ASP.NET and ASP can coexist on one web server. And it's not
> that platform
> > specific as you think it is (yes, classic ASP was, but that
> goes for many
> > script languages, even today) - since the .NET Framework is
> built on an ECMA
> > standard (the CLI - see
> >
> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-335.htm)
> > you'll easily find your way to Linux and Mac OSX through
> Mono compatible
> > projects. Develop in Windows and deploy almost anywhere, I'd say.
> >
> > To stay on the XSLT 2.0 track, MS will not add any XSLT 2.0
> until there is a
> > stable W3C Rec available - at least that is what I've
> picked up until now -
> > so that's why we've started the Saxon.NET effort. Although
> early and a bit
> > slow I'd say it is a wonderful step forward.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > <prs/>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Antsnio Mota [mailto:amsmota@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Jueves, 10 de Marzo de 2005 02:48 p.m.
> > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files
> >
> > Hmmm, since i'm not a english native *and* not a MS expert,
> the "terrific"
> > here is a good thing or a bad thing? It's "terrific" in the sense of
> > "terror" or in the sense of "uau!".
> >
> > Or simply putting it it's   :)    or    :(   ?
> >
> > Now we're using a IIS with asp on it, but i'll prefer a
> platform agnostic
> > thing. The upgrade(?) a "normal" asp to asp.net is straithforward?
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:36:04 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort
> > <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > One way would be to upgrade to ASP.NET with its terrific
> XML support,
> > > and use Saxon.NET which supports XSLT 2.0.
> > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/saxondotnet/
> > >
> > > NB1: Saxon.NET is an OS effort to port the great Saxon
> product to .NET
> > > and Mono. All functionality offered has its origin in
> Saxon, therefore
> > > all credits go to its creator, Michael Kay.
> > >
> > > NB2: Saxon.NET is still an early beta product, and is
> currently about
> > > 25% slower than using Saxon (on Windows). There is a workaround to
> > > this - you can spawn processes in ASP.NET which run Saxon
> > > transformations in the background and return to you the
> output, which
> > > is the same as running Saxon from the command line, and
> thus has the same
> > performance.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > <prs/>
> > > http://www.pietsieg.com

Current Thread