Subject: RE: [xsl] Combining two node Sets into one From: "Williamson, Chris" <cwilliamson@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 17:39:56 -0500 |
Who should I sue for my wasted time? ;) -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 5:37 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] Combining two node Sets into one > You can probably tell my inexperience with this because I > probably opted to > take the most complex path possible. I will give this a try > on Monday and > see what I can come up with. No, writing pipelines of simple transformations is in general an excellent way of breaking up a problem into simple reusable parts. Your instincts were right. It's just a darned nuisance that XSLT 1.0 doesn't support this approach properly. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Combining two node Sets i, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Combining two node Sets i, Williamson, Chris |
RE: [xsl] Combining two node Sets i, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Identity Transform xml fo, Karl Stubsjoen |
Month |