|
Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:perform-sort (in 2.0) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:28:15 +0100 |
Actually the equivalence is to:
<xsl:for-each select="$in">
<xsl:sort select="."/>
<xsl:sequence select="."/>
</xsl:for-each>
since no copying is involved.
ah yes, thanks.
Any reason why xsl:sequence doesn't take xsl:sort
so the equivalence would be
<xsl:sequence select="$in">
<xsl:sort select="."/>
</xsl:sequence>
which would I think mean that xsl:perform-sort was identical to
xsl:sequence?
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] xsl:perform-sort (in 2.0), Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] math return result problem, 04083259 |
| RE: [xsl] xsl:perform-sort (in 2.0), Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Bedtime reading..., Pieter Reint Siegers |
| Month |