Subject: [xsl] Measuring the complexity of XSLT stylesheets From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:56:02 +0200 |
I'm writing a paper where I'm evaluating different XML vocabularies for expressing the same information, and one of my evaluation criteria is how easily the resulting XML can be processed with XSLT. At the moment the paper contains only prose with a subjective appraisal of the various approaches. This is fine, as far as it goes, but it would be nice to have something more objective to back it up with. Are there any established criteria for evaluating the complexity of XSLT stylesheets? There are some obvious criteria I could think of, like: - size of stylesheet in bytes, lines, and XML elements+attributes, - number of elements from the XSLT namespace, and - combined length (in characters) of XPath expressions. I think these criteria would work, but I'm not convinced that they really capture complexity directly. Can anyone suggest better alternatives? -- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > GSM: +47 98 21 55 50 <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] grouping by the first cha, cknell | Thread | Re: [xsl] Measuring the complexity , Sebastien Arbogast |
Re: [xsl] grouping by the first cha, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Measuring the complexity , Sebastien Arbogast |
Month |