Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images

> You don't always need the url() function, by the way.

It is mandatory, but some processors may not enforce that:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2002JanMar/0145

Best to follow the rules in case they get enforced one day..

David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, (continued) David Carlisle - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:03:42 +0100 J.Pietschmann - Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:24:01 +0200 JBryant - Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:27:02 -0500 JBryant - Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:34:16 -0500 David Carlisle - Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:42:35 +0100 <= craig webber - Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:50:00 +0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, JBryant	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, craig webber
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, David Carlisle	Date	Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, craig webber
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home