RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:47:42 +0100
> Anyway it would be interesting to see some more detailed study about 
> integration of subsetted RNG into XSLT 2.0.

It would indeed. Nice to know there's no danger of running out of things to
do.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread