Subject: Re: [xsl] following-sibling in a sorted result tree? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:53:45 +0100 |
see the thread Subject: RE: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl:sort earlier today where exactly this point was explained (By Michael, more clearly than me I think in this case) > Do I somehow need to create a parallel result tree? probably that's the easiest thing to do. First sort then process. <xsl:variable name="x"> <xsl:for-each select="ITEM"> <xsl:sort select="@NAME"/> <xsl:copy-of select="."/> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:variable> <xsl:for-each select="$x/ITEM"> <xsl:sort select="@NAME"/> <xsl:result-document href="./{$something}.html" format="myhtml"> ..... <xsl:value-of select="following-sibling::*[1]/@NAME"/> <!--next sorted ITEM ? --> .... </xsl:result-document> </xsl:for-each> There are probably slightly more involved ways that avoid copying all the item nodes, but the above is the basic idea. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] following-sibling in a sorted, Peter Heald | Thread | RE: [xsl] following-sibling in a so, Michael Kay |
[xsl] following-sibling in a sorted, Peter Heald | Date | RE: [xsl] following-sibling in a so, Michael Kay |
Month |