Subject: Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl:sort From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:21:26 +1000 |
On 4/28/05, Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is the obvious (and only) solution to use xxx:node-set against > transformed / sorted XML? The answer follows from the fact that XSLT is Turing-complete. Therefore, any problem, which has solution using the xxx:node-set() extension function should have a solution without using it. In the case of grouping and then sorting, one such pure XSLT 1.0 solution can be found at: http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200311/msg00659.html Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, Karl Stubsjoen | Thread | Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, Karl Stubsjoen |
[xsl] Cannot have a DOCTYPE declara, mad rat | Date | RE: [xsl] apply-templates and predi, tom tom |
Month |