Subject: Re: [xsl] Recognized Unicode characters? From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 06 May 2005 11:57:16 +0100 |
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > > Shouldn't that be <xsl:output encoding="US-ASCII"... for >> safety? >> > >> > Neither is completely safe of course, >> Michael> The spec only requires support for UTF-8 and UTF-16, Michael> anything else is optional. Michael> I personally use "iso-646" as the name of this Michael> encoding. The differences are immaterial (different names Michael> for some of the characters, I believe) but I prefer Michael> international standards as a matter of principle. Shouldn't this be ISO-646-US? -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Recognized Unicode charac, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] Recognized Unicode charac, Edward Bryant |
RE: [xsl] Recognized Unicode charac, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] RSS feeds and disable-out, David Carlisle |
Month |