|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?) From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 13 May 2005 10:56:48 +0100 |
>>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Dimitre> I was talking not about "functions" but about
Dimitre> xsl:function
Dimitre> Does it make a difference now?
I don't see it.
You originally said:
"xsl:function -s with side effects should not have been allowed -- in
the first place."
But that is not sufficient to guarentee that f($x) is f($x) always
returns true().
So have I missed a connection in the thread somewhere?
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams |
| Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams |
| Month |