Subject: Re: [xsl] Ascii end-of-file character output in an XSL file From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 21:08:02 +0100 |
> What is the rationale for that restriction? well, it ain't my decision of course:-) there is a similar constraint on codepoint-to-string that you can't give it any non-xml code-points so can only generate xml content strings not arbitrary unicode strings. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Nov/0200 starts off by saying Have the WGs considered dropping this constraint? I got the reply http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Dec/0088 David: Thank you for your comment. The F&O taskforce discussed this on 12/2/2003 and decided not to make the change to allow characters that are not legal XML characters. so now you know:-) I think the rationale is more or less that serialisation (and in particular choosing a non-xml output method) is an optional feature that conceptually follows the xslt transform which is an XML result tree aka data model aka infoset and the result tree should be able to be stuffed into XML pipeleines without being serialised at all and if it has null bytes and other control codes in there some API's might be unhappy. But as I say, don't blame me... David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Ascii end-of-file charact, Kevin Rodgers | Thread | RE: [xsl] Ascii end-of-file charact, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Frustrated with xxx:node-, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] empty string parsed as float?, Gabriel K |
Month |