Subject: RE: [xsl] What is exciting in XSLT 2.0 (Was: Re: [xsl] parameters in XSLT 2.0) From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:36:32 +0100 |
> personally, I think what is potentially useful is the building up of > function libraries. BTW what is the current interaction of compiled > stylesheets and XSLT 2.0...also can an XSLT 2.0 just have xsl:function > definitions ... > > so libraries can be built up? > There's nothing specific in the spec to support this, but I think it's probably something that implementations will end up providing. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] What is exciting in XSLT , James Fuller | Thread | Re: [xsl] parameters in XSLT 2.0, Bruce D'Arcus |
RE: [xsl] parameters in XSLT 2.0, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Test if an (image) file e, Michael Kay |
Month |