Subject: RE: [xsl] Schema aware transformations From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:54:56 +0100 |
> The problem here is that template match="schema-element(abc)" gets > rejected by the non-SA processor. Yes. I think you have to go into schema-aware processing wholeheartedly to get the benefits. It's not really something you can do by halves. The leads onto some questions: > > -Does the SA processor require a source schema for every > transform (when > using schema-element() etc)? No, a schema-aware processor can handle both typed and untyped input documents. > > -Is it possible to store the validated source (the PSVI?) and supply > that for subsequent transforms? Watch this space.... > > Other than the 2.0 spec, are there any good resources out there for SA > processing? There's a chapter in my book, but it was written before I had any real practical experience to share. So the answer is, very little. I've been meaning for a while to write some articles on the subject. I have given a few talks (the next one is in Prague on Saturday, but I think they're full...) Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Schema aware transformati, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | RE: [xsl] Schema aware transformati, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] xsl:element in XSLT 1.0, david_n_bertoni | Date | RE: [xsl] Whitespace problem, alway, Michael Kay |
Month |