Subject: RE: [xsl] Complicated grouping and column question From: "Brook Ellingwood" <belling@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:00:27 -0700 |
I didn't catch that the elements were unsorted. That changed everything. In my example the sorting is an arbitrary one done at time of data-entry, so my challenge wasn't nearly as great. -----Original Message----- From: Will McCutchen [mailto:mccutchen@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 2:56 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Complicated grouping and column question > I just did this exact same thing. My solution was to find middle child > of the parent elements, and identify it with a key, then put all the > preceding-siblings of that child's parent, plus the parent itself in > the left hand column, and all the following-siblings of that child's > parent in the right hand column. I tried a few experiments along these lines, but they did not work for me. I couldn't find the correct middle child because the elements weren't in the correct order. At least, I couldn't think of a way to do it on my own. Thanks for the help, though. Will.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Complicated grouping and , Will McCutchen | Thread | [xsl] generate text for every desce, Kevin Rodgers |
Re: [xsl] Complicated grouping and , Will McCutchen | Date | Re: [xsl] Complicated grouping and , David Carlisle |
Month |