Re: [xsl] Overlap (was: Grouping Text Nodes)

Subject: Re: [xsl] Overlap (was: Grouping Text Nodes)
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:13:46 +0100

do we have to answer the last question?

In regard to the other questions, basically yes, that sounds like a
strategy, although you might instead want to look at the LMNL stuff of
Jeni et al.

David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Grouping text nodes, (continued) David Carlisle - Thu, 4 Aug 2005 01:00:24 +0100 James Cummings - Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:38:03 +0100 David Carlisle - Thu, 4 Aug 2005 17:22:16 +0100 James Cummings - Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:06:20 +0100 David Carlisle - Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:13:46 +0100 <= Wendell Piez - Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:36:21 -0400 Jacoby, Peter R. - Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:13:14 -0400 Michael Kay - Thu, 4 Aug 2005 18:03:32 +0100

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Grouping text nodes, (continued)
- David Carlisle - Thu, 4 Aug 2005 01:00:24 +0100
  - James Cummings - Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:38:03 +0100
    - David Carlisle - Thu, 4 Aug 2005 17:22:16 +0100
    - James Cummings - Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:06:20 +0100
    - David Carlisle - Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:13:46 +0100 <=
    - Wendell Piez - Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:36:21 -0400
- Jacoby, Peter R. - Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:13:14 -0400
  - Michael Kay - Thu, 4 Aug 2005 18:03:32 +0100

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Overlap (was: Grouping Te, James Cummings	Thread	Re: [xsl] Overlap (was: Grouping Te, Wendell Piez
Re: [xsl] Overlap (was: Grouping Te, James Cummings	Date	Re: [xsl] Overlap (was: Grouping Te, Wendell Piez
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home