Subject: Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentHandler From: Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:02:03 +0530 |
Hi Mukul, Sorry if I hadnt been clear enough, but I wasnt proposing this to abide by SAX architecture . This is just another way of doing things that SAX does in its own way. cheers! Menon On 8/10/05, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8/10/05, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As an alternative, what if the User defines explicit methods like > > > > public void startEmployee() [simplified here- ignoting namespace mappings] > > public void endEmployee() > > public void onEmptyAdddress() > > public void onAttr_Employee_Name() [this is just illustrative of the > > attributes scenario.] > > Hi Menon, > SAX does'nt have this architecture. > > Regards, > Mukul > > > rgds, > > Menon > > > > -- > > Shift to the left, shift to the right! > > Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte! > > > > -Ramkumar Menon > > A typical Macroprocessor > > -- Shift to the left, shift to the right! Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte! -Ramkumar Menon A typical Macroprocessor
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentH, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentH, Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentH, Mukul Gandhi | Date | Re: [xsl] User defined SAX ContentH, Mukul Gandhi |
Month |