Subject: Re: [xsl] alphabetic set of xsl:result-document From: James Cummings <cummings.james@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:49:31 +0100 |
On 8/22/05, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > are you saying I should do something along the (currently-broken) > > sir, surely you are not suggesting that I would suggest a broken > approach? It will have to be pistols at dawn... No sir, you are a scholar and a gentleman. I was saying that my interpretation of your suggestion was broken. It is mine the feeble wit and addled brain, not yours. > . selects exctly one thing and lower-case() doesn't change that so this > line isn't doing very much: you are sorting/grouping a sequence of length 1. > <xsl:for-each-group select="lower-case(.)" > > You have the groups inside out: you first want (I think) to group on initial > letter, then, within that, group on the words. Ah! That explains it! Your solution, as always, worked perfectly on the test file and now I'll go try to feed it into the more complex version without causing too much trouble. Indebted as always, -James -- James Cummings, Cummings dot James at GMail dot com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] alphabetic set of xsl:res, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] alphabetic set of xsl:res, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] How to convert day-of-mon, Manfred Staudinger | Date | Re: [xsl] alphabetic set of xsl:res, James Cummings |
Month |