Subject: RE: [xsl] Transform XML to XML From: "Mike Schinkel" <mikes@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:31:53 -0400 |
>> there are more XSLT 1.0 processors than the market needs, Competition, especially in open-source, does tend to cause that to happen, no? :) >> But if you want me to stick my neck out, I would guess that there might be 5 XSLT 2.0 processors by early 2006 and perhaps 8 a year later. How complete they will be, and how many will be schema-aware, is anyone's guess. Looks like I won't get to see it incorporated into a Windows-based editor (I can afford) for a while... :( -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 10:23 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] Transform XML to XML > > Awesome! So when do you think most tools will support 2.0? > 2007? 2008? I expect to see a considerable shake-out: there are more XSLT 1.0 processors than the market needs, and many of them won't be upgraded. But if you want me to stick my neck out, I would guess that there might be 5 XSLT 2.0 processors by early 2006 and perhaps 8 a year later. How complete they will be, and how many will be schema-aware, is anyone's guess. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Transform XML to XML, JBryant | Thread | RE: [xsl] Transform XML to XML, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] RE: Yahoo shopping feed, , andrew welch | Date | RE: [xsl] dynamic variable name/imp, Michael Kay |
Month |