Subject: Re: [xsl] Generating implicit wrapper element From: Ferdinand Soethe <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:23:33 +0200 |
Michal Kay wrote: > This prevents it working in a pipelined environment where > the result tree that's output from the XSLT transformation is then input (in > tree form) to another process. An example of such a pipeline is the Netscape > browser, which is why d-o-e doesn't work on Netscape or Mozilla browsers. This is indeed a very good reason. Thanks for pointing that out. > In XSLT 2.0 this problem is easily solved using <xsl:for-each-group > group-adjacent="node-name()">. It's not all that hard in 1.0 either. My > preferred approach is sibling recursion: And thanks so much for the sample of sibling recursion. This does indeed look much more convincing. I'll work on understandmng the details ... -- Ferdinand Soethe
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Generating implicit wrapp, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Generating implicit wrapp, Mukul Gandhi |
RE: [xsl] Generating implicit wrapp, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] concat all items in a seq, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |